The Burr in the Burgh

Julie and I don't actually watch very much television. The news. Some documentaries here and there. Jacob likes sports and cartoons. Mostly television is just mind-rot.

However, there are exceptions. The program "24" has been around for several years now, but we'd never watched it. But then we picked up a DVD of the first episodes of the first season from the library. Now we're hooked.

Here is a neat site that has pictures of people who put stuff on their cats.



HT: Samantha Burns

A Roman Catholic bishop in Oregon has stated that it is heretical to be pro-abortion. See here. Of course, he's right. And here is why. It is impossible for a person to be both pro-choice and take the doctrine of the incarnation seriously. Jesus was conceived in the Virgin's womb by the Holy Spirit. So what was that in there? A blob of tissue? The eternal almighty Son of God became a sub-human blob of soul-less tissue? Yep, that's heresy alrighty.

It has often been observed that Germans lack a sense of humor. That's because there is nothing funny about being German. But as a 3/4 German American myself, I found this commercial especially humorous. Enjoy. Go here to see what I mean.

Here is another good article debunking the Mormon myth that Israelites emigrated to the Americas thousands of years ago. The DNA evidence does not support this foundational claim of the Book of Mormon.

Good reads:

As John Warwick Montgomery has said, faith must be founded on fact. If the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus did not take place historically, then our Christian faith would be less than worthless.

What if a foundational tenet of your religious faith is that the Native Americans are descended from a lost tribe of Israel and extensive DNA tests have proved that Native Americans originated in Asia, not the Middle East? This is the crisis now facing Mormonism.

See here and here.

In the seminary, I read some of the work of Dr. Richard Bauckham, professor at St. Andrew's University in Scotland. Then today I noticed this article which says he is giving a series of lectures in which he will defend the notion that the four Gospels were written by actual eye-witnesses of the events they describe.

Naturally, I concur with Dr. Bauckham. I don't think there'd be much point in being a Christian if the Gospel narratives were spurious in origin. I'm just glad to see that some major scholars are still unafraid to teach this publicly.

The commercial begins with husband and wife in the kitchen. She is at the counter and he is seated at the table.

She says, "So did you buy me that diamond necklace for Valentine's Day?"

He, "Uh, no."

She, "Oh, well then did you make reservations for a fancy dinner?"

He, "No."

She, "But you got me a dozen roses?"

He, "Actually, no."

She, "A card?"

He, "(pause) No. But I thought about it. I really did give it some thought."

She, "Awwwwwww, that's so sweet." Hugs and kisses ensue.

And then the announcer comes on and intones something like this, "Of course it's not just the thought that counts. Remember Hallmark when you care enough to send the very best."

This is actually a very profound theological observation. Thoughts and sentiments that are not backed up by actions are hollow.

John 3:16 says that God loved the world so he thought nice thoughts. Nope. It says He loved and so He gave. He gave Himself. Love acts. Am I right?

The sign in front of the United Church of Christ congregation in Limerick, PA read: "If only thou wilt worship me, then all will be thine" (Luke 4:7).

Sounds pious, eh? Until you notice that the person who speaks those words in the Gospel is SATAN.

Oops. Better change that sign. Blogger Justin Taylor cites this as evidence of biblical illiteracy. I think he's right. I don't think the UCC people in Limerick really want you to worship the devil. Considering that the UCC is one of the most liberal denominations in America, there's a good chance they don't even believe the devil exists.

The latest motto of the United Church of Christ is "God Still Speaks." And as Russell Moore over at Mere Comments notes, whether we believe in him or not, the devil is still talking too.

The PC police are slamming the new movie based on the classic children's book character, Curious George. Debbie Schlussel has some worthwhile commentary.

True conversion is not just giving up the bad. It means also giving up the good, in a sense. Giving up the notion that we bring our good works to God to win His favor. Good works are the natural, spontaneous and unavoidable result or fruit of being in God's favor, not the means of gaining it.

On December 16, 2005, Capuchin Father Raniero Cantalamessa preached before the pope the preeminence of faith. I don't know that he quite preached that justification is Christ's righteousness imputed or credited to unworthy sinners, but this illustration is a keeper.

Father Cantalamessa told a familiar Italian story about the shepherds near Bethlehem going to visit the newborn Jesus, each of them trying to outdo the others with the beauty of the gifts they offered.

One poor shepherd had nothing and was ashamed.

"Mary could not figure out how to accept all the gifts, since she was holding the baby in her arms," he said. "So, seeing the poor shepherd with his hands free, she handed Jesus to him."

"Having his hands free was his fortune and it should be ours as well," Father Cantalamessa said.

I love dogs and I love cats. I have one of the former and two of the latter. I'm not quite sure it's accurate to say I "own" two cats. I certainly own the dog, but I think the cats might own me. I think to them I'm just staff.

Here is how a dog thinks: "Hmmm. This man feeds me, plays with me, and cleans up after me. He must be god." A cat thinks: "Hmmm. This man feeds me, plays with me, and cleans up after me. I must be god."

Go here to see a page from a dog's diary beside a page from a cat's diary. Sums it up.

This man is a genius. He sells a DVD with two hours of nothing but himself sitting and drinking beer. That way you never have to drink alone. His web store says:

Rough day at work? No job? You've come to the right place. Steve has found a loophole that blurs the line between the casual drinker and the raging alcoholic! Simply pop in the video, choose how many beers you feel like having and relax with your new drinking buddy. No stupid chit chat, no crying about ex girlfriends, just you and Steve tipping a few back. Enjoy.

My wife, Julie, over at Jottings and Such said what I've been thinking. That happens a lot, by the way.

I'm all for rooting for the home team, but some of the signs seen in the Burgh around the Steelers big win are a bit much.


I kind of like Julie's alternative suggestion.

New Line has selected a director, Catherine Hardwicke, for their movie project The Nativity. It covers the two years leading to Mary and Joseph's trek to Bethlehem and the birth of Jesus. See here. And here. Jeffrey Overstreet at his blog Looking Closer asks who we would cast as the Virgin Mary. In my opinion, it should be a relatively unknown actress. Not someone with a body of previous work. She should be young. She should look semitic. Possibly an Arab actress. She could be pretty or plain, but she should not be sexy. My two shekels on the question.

[I always liked Olivia Hussey in Jesus of Nazareth above.]

Charles Colson wrote a very decent Breakpoint article on the invasion of substandard songs in church and how they are wreaking people's faith. Good insights.

Go here.


Musical Mush
Are We Impairing Our Capacity to Think?

February 6, 2006

When church music directors lead the congregation in singing some praise music, I often listen stoically with teeth clenched. But one Sunday morning, I cracked. We had been led through endless repetitions of a meaningless ditty called, "Draw Me Close to You." The song has zero theological content and could be sung in a nightclub, for that matter. When I thought it was finally and mercifully over, the music leader beamed at us and said in a cheerful voice, "Let's sing that again, shall we?" "No!" I shouted loudly. Heads all around me spun while my wife cringed.

I admit I prefer more traditional hymns. But even given that, I am convinced that much of the music being written for the Church today reflects an unfortunate trend—slipping across the line from worship to entertainment. Evangelicals are in danger of amusing ourselves to death, to borrow the title of the classic Neil Postman book.

The trend is also true of Christian radio, historically an important source of in-depth teaching. Many stations have recently dropped serious programming in favor of all-music formats. For example, a major Baltimore station dropped four talk shows to add music. A respected broadcaster recently dropped "Focus on the Family," claiming it had become too focused on "moral issues."

When a Cincinnati station replaced "BreakPoint" with music, I told the station manager that believers need to think Christianly about major worldview issues. Her reply? Younger women want "something to help them cope with life."

This view was confirmed by a Christian homemaker during a TV special on evangelicalism. She is so busy, she explained, with her kids, Bible study, cooking, and all, that she does not even get to read the newspaper. Church for her is getting her spirits lifted. Now admittedly, modern life creates enormous stress, but can't the Church offer comfort and help people confront the culture? Of course, music is important in the life of the Church. But it cannot replace solid teaching.

The decision by Christian broadcasters to avoid moral controversies could result in the Church withdrawing from the culture as it tragically did a century ago. The great strength of radio, as with books, has been to present in-depth teaching that engages Christians cognitively. Unfortunately, thinking analytically is something Christians find increasingly difficult. According to a government study, the average college graduate's proficient literacy in English has declined from 40 percent in 1992 to 31 percent ten years later. The study defines proficient literacy as the ability to read lengthy, complex texts and draw complicated inferences.

This is horrifying. The Gospel above everything else is revealed propositional truth—truth that speaks to all of life. Sure, the Gospel is simple enough for a child to understand. But if you want to study doctrine and worldview, you need the capacity to engage ideas cognitively. Doctrine and biblical teaching does not consist of dry, abstract notions. It is the truth that must be carried to the heart and applied. And there is no escaping that it is truth that must be learned.

When Postman published his book two decades ago, he feared television would impair our capacity to think. He was right. But can we learn from this—or are we destined to follow suit, with the Church blissfully amusing itself into irrelevance?

I like cats. Right now, I'm reading a book on the psychology of cats. Here's a super quote:

To human beings, communication is a means of expressing ideas. To cats, it is, too. The major difference is that for cats, the principle idea that is usually in need of expression is, "Get out of my face."

Not really. My headline is bogus. But I wrote it to make a point. It is contrary to the Hindu religion to kill and eat cows. But they don't plot to murder me at the McDonald's drive thru lane. Nor do they burn down my consulate in Lebanon.

Christians consider it blasphemous to portray Jesus as a girlie-man, wimpie, California, surfer dude, in touch with his inner puppy. But to my knowledge, angry mobs of Presbyterians did not wear veils and carry banners saying "Go to hell" in front of the NBC headquarters over The Book of Daniel.

Jews consider pigs to be unclean animals. But the hasid did not threaten to behead anyone when British office workers had coffee mugs brandishing the image of Winnie the Pooh character Piglet. [See here.]

Jeff Jacoby, columnist at the Boston Globe, penned this satire:

HINDUS CONSIDER it sacrilegious to eat meat from cows, so when a Danish supermarket ran a sale on beef and veal last fall, Hindus everywhere reacted with outrage. India recalled its ambassador to Copenhagen, and Danish flags were burned in Calcutta, Bombay, and Delhi. A Hindu mob in Sri Lanka severely beat two employees of a Danish-owned firm, and demonstrators in Nepal chanted: ''War on Denmark! Death to Denmark!"In many places, shops selling Dansk china or Lego toys were attacked by rioters, and two Danish embassies were firebombed.

Why is it that the ONLY major world religion that routinely uses violence and the threat of violence against its adversaries is Islam?

For a good read, check out The Great Divide: The failure of Islam and the Triumph of the West by Alvin Schmidt.

Found on Filibustercartoons via Little Green Footballs.

Arab newspapers publish horrendous anti-semitic cartoons all the time. See here. Naturally, THAT is OK. HT: Michele Malkin.

Get your championship Steelers gear here.

Thanks to Intolerant Elle for these real questions asked on job interviews.

These lovely signs are from a protest in London, England - not Tehran!! Listen, if I'm ever going to threaten to cut off someone's head, I'm at least going to be man enough to show my face.

All of this is a response to a series of cartoons making fun of Islam in a Danish paper. I get irked when Christianity is mocked (which it routinely is) and I will write letters, blog, boycott, etc. But what you see above is from the devil. Let's be honest.

For a good read, check out The Great Divide: The failure of Islam and the Triumph of the West by Alvin Schmidt.


HT: Michelle Malkin

The movie people at Christianity Today have posted what they consider the ten most "redeeming" movies of the year just past. By "redeeming" they mean that these are films about redemption - more or less. Here's their article.

I've seen five of the ten and I agree that those selections are good films that portray - either implicitly or explicitly - themes that parallel central Christian themes.


I must add that based on their recommendation, I am definitely going to rent Millions.

What is this world coming to?!?!

Check it out.

This is why I don't mess with the squirrels in our backyard. I'm telling you, these things are military geniuses.

I think the following piece by Charles Colson from his Breakpoint website is on the button!! Read it, please. The whole thing.

Ever wonder what Jesus meant when He said, “Let him who has ears, hear?” Well, an experience relayed to me by my good friend R. C. Sproul helps us understand the words of Jesus in today’s culture.

Some years ago, Sproul offered a rigorous course in Romans. Two hundred serious disciples signed up. Half-way through the course, Sproul took a week off to enroll in Evangelism Explosion (EE) courses. When he came back, he told his students about EE, including conversation openers like, “Why should God let you into heaven?” On a whim, he asked class members how they would answer.

Anyone who knows Sproul knows he teaches the great evangelical doctrine in Romans, justification by faith alone, in unmistakable terms. Every student should have known the answer. Not so. There were awkward pauses; some people mumbled about living a good life. Only thirty out of two hundred answered correctly. How could this be?

The answer may be found in two contemporary trends. First, modern evangelicalism puts undue weight on experience; if somebody lacks a personal testimony—and the more dramatic the better—he is made to feel like a second-class believer. This heavy reliance on feelings carries over in discipleship and worship. Contemporary music is intended to—and often does—whip people into a spiritual frenzy.

Our literature talks about “feeling” the presence of the Spirit—or experiencing God’s presence. This is all to the good when it results in people making a personal commitment to Jesus. But it can be dangerous when that is all there is. Doctrine may be seen as abstract and inaccessible because it seems unrelated to personal experience.

The second trend has to do with our high-tech age. Today, information is transmitted by images—pictures on televisions and computer screens. Modern technology teaches us in the same way cartoons teach us: images, rather than demanding that we wrestle with tough, analytical concepts. Experts tell us that learning through images rather than words results in a diminished capacity for complex thought.

Department of Education surveys tell the shocking story. In 1992, only forty percent of college graduates were deemed literate; that is, able to read and understand complex arguments and to give comprehensive answers. That is shockingly low. But even worse was the 2003 study, when literacy had declined to an astonishing 31 percent. This is why a group of today’s college graduates could sit through a course on Romans and complex doctrine and not get it.

Of all people, Christians must learn how to engage the mind and to employ reason and logic, to understand difficult concepts and grapple with complex propositions. After all, the Gospel is revealed propositional truth, communicated to us in a complex book. This is why Christians have always championed public education and launched so many institutions of higher learning.

And, want some good advice? Make your kids read books. Following the barbarian conquest of Europe, Irish monks preserved books in their monasteries. As the barbarian hordes receded, they sent missionaries back to the continent to teach reading and the Bible.

Perhaps it is time again for Christians to prepare missionaries—to teach people to think.

He who has ears—let him hear.

Uh ... if you find me with my head severed from my body, you'll know why. This bit of Koran Karaoke is brilliant. You have to watch this.

UPDATE: If the link above does not work, go here instead.

HT: The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns

Just as the battle is underway in the United States over whether Intelligent Design should be included in the public school curriculum, we read this article from BBC News which states that less than half of the Britons polled believe that evolution is the best explanation for the origin of life. This is remarkable considering the relative secularity of England over against the U.S. Even in a nation where far fewer people attend religious services, a sizeable minority (39%) believe in some theory of origins other than Darwinism and over 40% believe alternate theories (creationism or intelligent design) should be included in public education.

FYI - On Saturday, April 1, Dr. Angus Menuge will give a day-long seminar at Concordia Lutheran Church, 3109 Brownsville Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15227, (412)881-3005 on the question of science and faith, particularly as this relates to the current Intelligent Design controversy .

HT: Jame's M. Kushiner at Touchstone's Mere Comments

I have to admit that my first thought when I read this article is that the guy is a bum. On second thought, that's my second thought too.

E.J. Park has written a fine article for the latest issue of Christianity Today called A Tale of Two Kitties. Now, I love this article for so many reasons. First, because I have two kitty cats and anything with the above title is going to make me say, “Awww.” But seriously, the article touches on two fictional cats that mean a lot to me, for vastly different reasons. The article’s subtitle sums it up: “Lovers of Aslan should heed the warnings of the creator of Hobbes.”

Bill Watterson is the creator of the much-loved comic strip (retired in 1996) Calvin and Hobbes. As fans know, Hobbes is a stuffed tiger toy for the impish Calvin and who comes alive – in Calvin’s imagination? – when they are alone. Hobbes is Calvin’s conscience, the better angel of his nature.

Even though there are countless millions to be made, Watterson has not permitted his comic strip to be used for merchandise. You won't see Calvin wishing you a happy birthday on the front of a Hallmark card. You won't find comic strip panels on coffee mugs or T-shirts. According to Watterson, it would ruin the characters he has created to pull them from the comics and put them into another medium. Giving voices to an animated Calvin & Hobbes Halloween special, for instance, would change them in some fundamental way. Or so Watterson believes.

I have been a huge fan of C.S. Lewis's Narnia books since my youth. I was delighted when I learned that The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe was being made into a film. And over all, I was happy with it. But now, I'm thinking hard about what Bill Watterson has to say about his characters and the CT article by E.J. Park.

Transforming Aslan from the medium of text to film was always a risky idea. Aslan is a Christ-figure and generations of readers have deeply felt attachments to him as an image of the Savior. Since in my opinion, the film does a fair job, I have given it a pass. But now, seeing Hasbro Aslan action figures and Aslan t-shirts, and Aslan plushy dolls, that changes things. There is something troubling, maybe even sacreligious, about playing with an Aslan toy amidst the Barbie dolls and army men. Or is there? It's just a lion. No, it's an imaginative portrait of Jesus that is being marketed, commercialized and profited from. As Parks says, "Of course, this article is not really about Aslan at all. It is about the Lion behind the lion. For it is one thing to commercialize fictitious kitties; it is quite another to commercialize the way of God."

Is the medium the message? To some extent, I think so. Parks writes: "The fact is, the spirit of a work always differs between forms, because every form has its own characteristics and limitations. ... The story and character might be similar in two works, but they are distinctly shaped by each work's form. Reading a book is never the same experience as watching a movie, which is never the same experience as playing a video game, which is never the same experience as wearing a T-shirt."

NBC has decided to cancel the controversial new show The Book of Daniel. Check out this article. And all I can think of to say is, "Duh!?" I predicted this would happen from the very start.

See my previous post about the show right here.

This comes to me from the lovely Cubicle Reverend.

Four jobs I have had (in chronological order)

• busboy
• the guy who deep fries taco shells for Taco Bell
• Ice cream man
• optician at Lens Crafters
  

• Kansas City, MO
• Ann Arbor, MI
• Fort Wayne, IN
• Los Angeles, CA
  

• Sushi Rolls
• Rogan Josh
• Chili (very spicy with lots of onions)
  
• Fried Oreos
  

• The Lord of the Rings
• Memento
• Saving Private Ryan
• Band of Brothers
  

• Someplace Sunny
• Just about any Caribou Coffee shop
• On a cruise
• Visting the Holy Land

• www.thunderstruck.org
• www.lookingcloser.blogspot.com
• www.merecomments.typepad.com/merecomments
• www.higherthings.org
  

• Julie at Jottings and Such
• Jason Evans at Theology Geek
• Jane at Indiana Jane's Journal
• Frank at Putting Out the Fire
  

Mutti over at Beckfest offers this quote:
The test of the morality of a society is what it does for its children. --D. Bonhoeffer


And her excellent application:
I say the test of a morality of a society is what it does to its unborn children.

One of my flaws is that I can never seem to read one book at a time.

I usually have at least one item of fiction going.

A book on homiletics that came highly recommended by a friend.

A book by one of my favorite writers about one of my favorite writers.


What I'll read next:



What's on your reading list?

Pr. Petersen gives a very edifying reflection here. People sometimes ask how things are going at church. They want more than the customary "fine." How to answer?

I like movies. And I like history. But I seldom like it when someone joins the two together. Films about historical figures or based on historical events generally disappoint or upset me. That's because most film-makers seem to be less interested in telling the story than in promoting their social agendas. A great example of this is Ridley Scott's latest piece of celluloid excrement, The Kingdom of Heaven. Badly filmed, badly acted, badly edited and, most of all, badly written. The Christians are either insane, idiotic, savage or anachronisitic models of 21st century liberal Protestants. Orlando Bloom is supremely over-rated and needs to stick to playing taciturn fairies. And those are reasons I called The Kingdom of Heaven the worst movie on earth.

But enough about that. There are two new films that deal with historical subjects which are receiving a good deal of attention right now: Munich and The New World. I haven't seen either one of them yet, so I won't offer any personal opinions about them in this post.

I will, however, link you to a few reviewers that I respect.

First, here is Michael Medved on Munich. I'm not very familiar with all the information surrounding the events recounted in the film, but if we assume (for the sake of argument) Mr. Medved is correct with his facts, then Spielberg has done a disservice to Israel, America, and the war on terror. Admittedly, I am a-priori inclined to agree with Medved because I have personally found him to be a level-headed film critic and one whose opinions about movies frequently parallel my own. He particularly earned my respect when, as an observant Orthodox Jew, he vociferously defended Mel Gibson's movie. The fact that the government of Israel is attacking Spielberg's movie Munich also causes me to suspect Medved's evaluation has merit. Religiously, I am no Zionist. I don't think the piece of real estate lying between Egypt and Syria has any more significance today in God's plan than does Lichtenstein. But I wholeheartedly endorse the state of Israel's right to defend itself. And to equate a government's attack on its enemies to terrorist acts is morally irresponsible.

The second film of interest is called The New World and it's about John Smith's landing in America and his relationship with the native girl, Pocahontas. Several Christian critics are speaking favorably of the film such as Steve Beard, Peter T. Chattaway and Jeffrey Overstreet. This film version, I am pleased to report, represents Pocahontas's conversion to Christianity and does so, apparently, without rancor. If so, then this is much better history than the putrid mess put out by Disney a few years ago which turned this Christian native American girl into a tree-hugging, New Age, Greenpeace, Gaia worshipper.

I just arrived home this evening from a week of theological stimulation at my alma mater. Each January, Concordia Theological Seminary, Ft. Wayne, IN holds a series of lectures relating to topics of biblical and systematic theology. I always enjoy attending this event, certainly because of the lectures, but also for the social interaction. Many alumni treat this week as a grand reunion. I get to see friends and classmates from all over the world whom I seldom see otherwise. And the chapel services are nothing less than phenomenal. Hearing 500 Lutheran pastors singing hymns in that building is riveting. But I know that I also benefit from the laughs and conversations, sharing a beer or three, with my colleagues in the pastoral ministry. And yet. . . it feels so good to be home.

I found this quote over on Rightwing News. He got it from Hog On Ice.

"Imagine the kerfuffle (if Jesus came back today). He comes back, and He goes on TV and says, "Okay, homosexuality is wrong. Sex outside of marriage is wrong. Stop watching porn. Quit smoking dope. And by the way, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and all the other non-Christian religions are wrong, so stop practicing them." Every fat lesbian activist in San Francisco would be out in the street, running around topless and waving a sign reading, "Kill Jesus NOW!" Jesse Jackson would condemn Him. Cindy Sheehan would demand a meeting. Liberals would start calling him JesusHitler."

First, let me be clear. I firmly believe in equal pay for equal work. I am not opposed to all of the ideals of the women's movement. Of course, no one, woman or man, has the right to kill unborn children. But that's not the subject I want to address right now.

One of the stereotypical feminist canards is that men are violent and women are nurturing. The joke is usually that if women ruled the world, there'd be no wars. I don't deny that men are violent, but if you don't think women can be every bit as mean and nasty... well, we'll just have to agree to disagree on that. And don't try to read between my lines. I am blessed to be married to the most perfect wonderful woman on the planet who would never intentionally hurt a flea (actually fleas do need to be afraid of my wife). I'm just trying to point out that radical feminism is hypocritical.

The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by men. And the idea of a fun time for a batch of 10 year old boys usually includes heavy doses of punching, tackling, tripping, tumbling and even biting. Clearly testosterone is a mighty powerful chemical.

I will agree that all men are selfish jerks. But so are all women, frankly. Spite, wrath, vindictiveness, pettiness, egocentrism and vanity are gender neutral vices. Women are not as likely to express their aggressions by taking a swipe at your face, but the demonization of masculinity and the attempted emasculation of church and society are not going to improve the world.

The knife block you see pictured above is an actual product. It's called the "All Men Are Bastards Knife Block."

HT: Right Wing News

Last night, here at Concordia Theological Seminary in Ft. Wayne, IN, we held our first Confessional Lutheran Bloggers Conference. It was fun. Got to meet some great people whose blogs I read every day.

Our speakers were:

Pr. Walt Snyder of Ask the Pastor
Dr. Gene Veith of Cranach
Rev. Eric Stefanski of CAT41 (not a blog)
Jason Evans of Theology Geek

In addition to the speakers and myself, the other Lutheran Bloggers that were present are listed below. Forgive me if I forget someone. I didn't have a chance to greet everyone and we didn't take attendance. Tell me if you were omitted. There were also a number of non-bloggers present who are interested in blogging.

Beggar's All

Bloghardt's Reflector

Confessions of a Young Lutheran

Drowning Myself Whenever I Can

Indiana Jane

The Joshua Victor Theory

Madre's Missives

Preachrblog

Putting Out the Fire

Rev. Cwirla's Blogosphere


This was a good start. And the presentations were very good. Perhaps this is something that we can do again next year and, with more publicity, get even more Lutheran bloggers to meet face to face (in "hard-copy" as Dr. Veith put it) and share ideas.

Thanks to Jason, to Rev. Zimmerman at the sem and Mr. John Klinger, the tech wizard and thanks to everyone else too.

Have you heard about NBC's newest dramedy airing on Friday nights? It's got an impressive cast.

It's called The Book of Ishmael and it's about this suburban pill-popping Muslim imam named Ishmael who gets regular visitations from the prophet Mohammed. And the twist is that Mohammed is this cool, laid-back California prophet who specializes in snappy one-liners.

The show has raised a bit of a ruckus because Ishmael is a drug addict, his wife is an alcoholic, his daughter shows her ankles to the boys at school and his adopted Chinese son is really a transgendered gigolo with low self-esteem.

The fact that every devout Muslim in the world considers the show blasphemous is not a concern of the Network. Insiders say that before long, N B C will stand for No one Buys Commercials.

Antonio Soprano as Ernest Hemingway? Yeah, maybe. See here. Make sure you read the last couple of paragraphs.

It's late and I've had a long and tiring day. My brain is too spent to work properly right now. But I just know that tomorrow morning I am going to be able to think of all kinds of reasons why this is bad.

Go here for the story.

HT: Southern Conservative

Darrell, over at Film Geeks 2.0, has posted a new review of The Exorcism of Emily Rose. And since I just watched the DVD two nights ago myself, I thought I would post a few words. I commented on this film earlier when it was first in the theaters, as did Darrell.

I think it was a good movie. Probably one of my five favorites of the year. First because it was just so well made. The cast was top of the line. Jennifer Carpenter, as Emily Rose, deserves some attention. She was superlative. Laura Linney, who has never given a bad performance, said more with her facial expressions at times than most actors do with a thousand lines of text. Her intelligence was commanding. And if Tom Wilkenson is not nominated for an Academy Award, an injustice will have occured. Usually Christian clergy are portrayed in films as either ignorant, bigotted, or villainous - or all three. Wilkenson's Father Moore was intelligent, sensitive, pastoral, strong, passionate about his beliefs, and willing to sacrifice himself for what is good.

As a pastor, I think this film and others like it can serve a useful purpose. Movies about the devil or demon possession are often overly sensationalistic, gory or special effects laden. This one had it's scary moments, but it was comparatively easy handed in the effects department, which I appreciated. This put more of the attention on the characters. And these characters are exceptionally well-drawn.

What I didn't like:

• While in jail, when Father Moore was being attacked by demonic powers, he prayed to St. Michael for protection. Now the good thing is that it showed that prayer protected him from the devil. But why would he pray to an angel? There is no biblical promise that angels can hear and answer prayer. But there are countless promises that God hears us and answers us when we call out to Him. Pray to God to send an angel, if you like, but don't bother praying to the soldiers when you have ready access to the commander in chief.


• The anthropologist who testified for the defense only muddied the picture as far as I am concerned.


• I found the ending unsatisfactory. I won't spoil it, but I thought it was kind of strange.