I hereby declare that Pastor Alms in North Carolina is my kindred spirit. I hope he is not offended. You should read his blog daily. Today, he reflects on the question: "What Does a Pastor Do All Day? It's a very good post.
It reminds me of a cartoon I once saw. A pastor is in his study kneeling in prayer. And his secretary peeks around the door and says, "Oh good, you're not busy."
He's praying, but according to her, he's not doing anything really important. I hate the idea that a pastor is supposed to be "busy." It's killing the church. "Busy" does not always mean faithful. People, with the best heart, will say to me, "I know you're busy . . . " And I try to correct them. Do I have a lot to do? Yes. Is my time and energy limited? Yes. But God forbid that I ever become a busy pastor.
I read somewhere that we must make a distinction between that which is urgent and that which is important. I find I have to do this all the time. So many different things pull at me, I must sometimes discriminate. What may be urgent to someone (meaning they want me to pay attention to it right now), might not be important. And what is important, might not be urgent. Hopefully, we put our first energies toward what is both important and urgent.
Most people measure effectiveness according to output or production. Some pastors give in to the temptation to make sure they have observable things they can show others as evidence that they are doing a good job. They live by what I call the ABCs of church meetings: Attendance, Buildings, and Cash.
Other times, simply moving around a lot, always walking fast, making sure you are seen in all the right places, and having a distracted look in your eyes gives people the illusion that ministry is taking place. And many pastors derive their sense of self-esteem from having people think they are movers and shakers in the kingdom of God.
Of course, I have duties I must attend to. People to visit. Meetings to attend. Things to do. But how can I really tabulate the hours spent in prayer, in devotion, in casual pastoral conversation. How much time should I allot for sermon prep or teaching prep? I find it difficult to keep everything to a rigid schedule. Sometimes I need to crunch on a text for a long time before I can offer something meaningful. Sometimes I need to meditate (not in the Eastern empty-your-head way). Nothing kills prayer, reflection and study more than "busy."
Monday, September 12, 2005
Am I a Busy Pastor?
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/12/2005 08:38:00 PM
3
comments
I Retract.
Someone named Tim J. over at another blog, has given me this wise and gentle rebuke:
After re-reading the story, and considering the source (a London tabloid) I think it's possible the story is simply false.He is right. This is well said. Thanks for reminding me of what I already know. I let the emotion of the moment cloud my thinking. Sphere: Related Content
But, to answer Scott- Directly killing people in order to alleviate suffering is wrong. Extreme circumstances don't change that. If we begin to kill people to save them from suffering, then where do we draw the line? Do we include emotional or mental suffering? How bad should the suffering be? What constitutes "terminal" illness? I know it's a slippery slope argument, but it happens to be true.
Sometimes, in order to follow God's will, we have to be willing to shoulder our cross, even if it involves great suffering. As hard as it is, sometimes we have to watch other people carry a terrible cross, and may be powerless to help.
We should always do all we can to comfort the suffering, but God is sovereign. We can't say, "Well, it would be better for them to die.". That is despair, and despair is the opposite of faith.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/12/2005 01:42:00 PM
3
comments
Euthanasia: What I Really Think
Euthasia is a form of murder. I opposed what was done to Terri Schiavo on that basis. She wasn't dying. She wasn't on life support. She wasn't suffering. Please read what I wrote on that matter in these previous posts here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
Yesterday's post, however, has caused some stir, understandably. That's why I want to clarify myself. I am willing to be rebuked and corrected. I may have misunderstood the facts. I may have voiced poor judgment (wouldn't be the first time). But allow me to ask a hypothetical question. Are there any scenarios - any scenarios at all - in which euthanasia may be the lesser of two evils? I'm not necessarily speaking of the case in N.O. And I'm not trying to start a flame war. I am sincerely asking the question.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/12/2005 01:20:00 PM
2
comments
Sunday, September 11, 2005
New Orleans Doctors Killed Their Patients
The British newspaper, Daily Mail, reported today that some New Orleans doctors gave lethal doses of morphine to some of their patients during the recent evacuation due to hurricane Katrina.
Was this morally wrong?
See above for my response. Here and here.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/11/2005 11:23:00 PM
6
comments
Friday, September 09, 2005
God Is Impotent According to Tony Campolo
The hurricane in the gulf coast was terrible. And I grieve for the many lives that were lost. We all do. And it's common that at times like this, people want to know why such things happen.
Some will answer that God sent the hurricane to punish those crummy sinners. Others will conclude that it is evidence that God does not even exist.
It's the old quandry. How can there be such suffering if God is both all good and all powerful. If he wants to help, but is unable, then he is not all powerful. And if he is able to intervene, but is unwilling, then he is not all good. Or so the reasoning goes.
Author, professor and ordained minister, Tony Campolo, has published an article about the hurricane Katrina, in which he says that we can't make God responsible for what happened because God, poor thing, is trying his hardest. So lay off. Campolo then spouts off one rank heresy after another.
According to Campolo, the Hebrew bible never claims that God is almighty. He writes: "Perhaps we would do well to listen to the likes of Rabbi Harold Kushner, who contends that God is not really as powerful as we have claimed."
It seems to me that the God who created the universe might be able to overpower a lot of fast moving air. Let's see, isn't that whole creation of the universe business somewhere in the Hebrew bible? Oh, there it is - on the first page. Didn't God create man from the dust of the ground and breathe the breath of life into him? Doesn't the Hebrew Bible talk about a God who could part the Red Sea so the Israelites could pass through on dry land? And isn't this the Hebrew God who once flooded the whole planet killing every living thing that wasn't snugly safe in Noah's ark? Too bad this God of the Kushner Hebrews can't hold back all that really heavy water pushing on the levees. If bad things happen on God's watch, according to Campolo, it's because He is not strong enough to do anything about it.
And why does Campolo ignore the clear teachings of the other 27 books of the Bible? Jesus calmed the wind and waves by saying "Be still (cf. Mark 4:39)." What is Campolo suggesting? That maybe Jesus doesn't have enough mojo for a reeeeeeaaaalllllly big storm? What's harder to do? Raise your own self from the dead or stop a hurricane?
Campolo denies the doctrine of original sin. He says, "Certainly, God would not create suffering for innocent people, who were--for the most part--Katrina’s victims." All people are sinful and deserve God's wrath. I'm not saying that Katrina was God exercising His wrath, but I am saying we all deserve that and worse. Who are all these innocent people that deserve to have lives free of suffering??
Underlying his whole erroneous theology is a brand of the philosophy of dualism. Yin and Yang. Black and White. Light and Darkness. Good and Evil. Duking it out with the earth as the battlefield. He writes: "In scripture we get the picture of a cosmic struggle going on between the forces of darkness and the forces of light. The good news is that, in the end, God will be victorious."
I couldn't decide what to entitle this post. My other option was Tony Campolo is a Heretic. I decided to use what you see up above, but not because Campolo's not a heretic. He is. A Christian is a person who believes stuff. Particular stuff. Not just any ol' stuff.Can a person be saved while persistently denying the Nicene Creed? No, of course not. And Christianity teaches that God is omnipotent.
I don't have a pat answer, like Campolo's, as to why hurricanes kill people. It's a mystery I cannot fathom. But the Scriptures - Old and New - simply do not permit us to deny either God's goodness or His greatness.
Rabbi Kushner may want to leave the room because I am going to quote a scripture which he would not accept. When St. Gabriel announced to the virgin Mary that she would bear in her womb the eternal Logos, she wondered how this could be. And the angel said, "For NOTHING is impossible with God."
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/09/2005 11:05:00 PM
5
comments
Tribute to Islam in Somerset County, PA
Do you remember September 11, 2001 when Muslim terrorists hijacked flight 93? The plane crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania when heroic Americans fought against the hijackers and 40 people died in the crash.
For some reason, the memorial that is being built on the site as a tribute for the victims of this terrible incident is actually designed to honor their terrorist murderers instead. A red crescent??
Give me a break! Isn't this like building a World War II memorial in the shape of a swastika?
Reported by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Thanks to Bunnie Diehl for pointing this out.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/09/2005 12:00:00 PM
3
comments
Thursday, September 08, 2005
Other Linkers
Friends,
Every once in a while, I discover a blog out there that has linked to me. In return, I'm recommending that you all click on their links below and give them a look. Naturally, all the usual caveats apply. Namely, that I don't necessarily agree or disagree with everything they write. But they are cool, often humorous, insightful, interesting and worth your time. If they look promising, bookmark them and read them regularly.
And while you are there, please leave a comment somewhere telling them I sent you.
These are just a few of them. I'd love to hear from you if you know of any others.
BlogWerks
Christianity is Jewish
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns
The Cubicle Reverend
Noahware
Raging Rabbits
The Southern Conservative
Tales from the DorkSide
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/08/2005 11:07:00 AM
3
comments
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
It's About Time
I'd like to be the first to officially welcome my wife, authoress Julie Stiegemeyer, to the blogosphere. Go check her out at Jottings and Such. Bookmark it and return often because I can guarantee you'll be finding lots of wit and insight there.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/07/2005 04:43:00 PM
0
comments
Just to Irritate the French
One more reason that I really like Lance Armstrong.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/07/2005 04:09:00 PM
0
comments
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
Theology and Film
Dr. Gene Veith offers two outstanding articles in last week's WORLD magazine, a weekly you should all subscribe to.
I enjoy literature and movies. And one thing that interests me is the intersection of theology/worldview and narrative. There is a lot of theology (or theological implications) in popular books and films, much of it bad. But sometimes, remarkably, elements of truth are found interwoven in the stories that are told. This may be intentional or unintentional. Either way, it affects the reader or viewer.
Dr. Veith writes here about Christians who work in the film industry. And here, he presents insights about movies that contain a message. I particularly appreciate his observation (paraphrasing into my own words) that while visual images can communicate emotion effectively, words are required to communicate meaning.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/06/2005 10:59:00 PM
2
comments
Sunday, September 04, 2005
Why Do Bad Things Happen to Good People?
The Sixteenth Sunday After Pentecost
September 4, 2005
Text: Luke 13:1-5
I know that many of you, like me, have been glued to the television this week, stunned by the destruction Katrina left behind on the southern gulf coast. The historic port city of New Orleans, a city known for its Cajun cuisine and jazz music, has been largely devastated. Hundreds of thousands of families are left homeless, with all of their possessions lost or destroyed.
Right away people begin to ask the question, “Why did this happen?” I understand that. I ask “why” too when bad things happen to me and the people I care about. So for today’s sermon, I want to address the age-old question of why do bad things happen to good people.
But in order to do that, the first thing we need to do is unravel the question itself. Notice the assumption that we are all a bunch of good people who never deserve to suffer anything. In most cases, when people endure hardship, they believe what they are going through is unfair. That they’ve done nothing to deserve unhappiness. So my first question for you is why do we assume that we should be immune from suffering?
The Bible teaches us that all men, all human beings, are sinful creatures who deserve nothing before God except His wrath and punishment. Every good thing we do receive in life, including life itself, is a gift from God, and one that we have done nothing to earn or deserve.
But even Christians who claim to understand all that, even we often expect God to take our earthly sufferings away if we pray hard enough. There is this idea that God should help us and not only that, but that God should help us immediately. Any delay at all is seen as a flaw on the part of God.
The problem of evil and suffering has vexed philosophers and theologians almost from the beginning of time. Many skeptics and unbelievers find this to be a hurdle they cannot get past. Some people will say something like this: I can imagine a God who is all good. And I can imagine a God who is all powerful. But I cannot imagine a God who is both all good and all powerful when there is so much suffering in this world. You see, people think that if God is willing to help us, but unable, then He is not all powerful. And if He is able to help us but unwilling, then He is not all good.
And I must confess that I simply don’t have a pat answer for you. It’s a paradox. We cannot explain things of this nature which God, in His Word, has not explained to us.
Liberal theology solves the problem by cutting God down to size and suggesting that is not really as clever or powerful as we thought. They preserve His goodness while denying His greatness. This theological approach appeared in the bestselling book from a few years back by Rabbi Harold Kushner entitled Why Do Bad Things Happen to Good People? Rabbi Kushner’s idea of God is of a well-meaning deity who is as frustrated by human suffering as we are. God would like to do something about cancer, hurricanes and tsunamis, but He is simply unable to do so. Harold Kushner’s idea is that we shouldn’t blame God because the poor thing is doing the best He can under the circumstances.
As Christians, we stand by the Biblical witness which tells us that God is, in fact, almighty, that nothing is too difficult for Him. And He is, at the same time, perfectly good and loving. These two things are indeed both true. God is not a passive bystander or a helpless spectator. Nor is He a cruel and heartless tyrant. So why then does He allow bad things to happen?
The Bible is not always very helpful with the “why” questions. It’s great on who and what and sometimes even when and how. But God does not give us a lot of answers to why.
Parents know that when children reach 2 or 3 years of age, they begin to ask “why” about everything. It’s perfectly natural and means that they are curious to learn about the world around them and that’s a good thing. But sometimes children ask “why” about things that there is just no easy way to answer. So parents sometimes have to simplify things to a point their children can handle. And sometimes, every once in a while, the answer is just too complicated for the child to understand and the parent may just have to say, “Sweetie, trust me on this one.”
When it comes to the problem of human suffering and why God might allow it to take place, we have to allow room for mystery. You see, I think we are trying to put together a puzzle without having all the pieces. Only God has all the pieces. Or it's like we are trying to put together a mosaic without knowing the grand design. That doesn’t mean that there isn’t a grand design behind it all, only that we don’t know what it is. It may just be beyond our ability to comprehend so our Heavenly Father says to us, in effect, “Sweetie, trust me.”
Corrie ten Boom tells the story of visiting someone in the hospital who was feeling very sorrowful because he was so sick he could hardly breathe. He wanted to die because he felt like his life had no meaning, that it was worthless. So Corrie reached into her bag and withdrew a piece of fabric that she had been embroidering. And she held it up for the man to see and she said, “Your life right now is like the back side of this embroidery. All you can see are the different colored threads all mixed up and knotted and tangled. It makes no sense. But when you turn it around, you can see that I am weaving a beautiful picture.”
In our suffering in this life, in this world so badly corroded by sin, we are looking at the underneath of a magnificent tapestry. Only when we reach the other side, will it all make sense to us. Christian faith means trusting that God is good and kind and loving and the He is still in charge of the universe, even when the circumstances make it appear to be otherwise. Knowing that God will show mercy to His children and that, as He promised in His Word, He is working all things together for our good.
As Joseph told his brothers in the book of Genesis after they’d sold him into slavery and he eventually became the second in command of all of Egypt, second only to Pharoah himself, Joseph said, “What you meant for evil, God meant for good.” While Joseph was suffering and waiting in an Egyptian prison cell, do you think he fully understood that in the future, God would use him to prepare an empire for a great famine thus saving thousands and thousands of lives from starvation? No, of course not. He didn’t know how everything was going to work out but he trusted God. And that’s the point.
Was this hurricane a sign of God’s wrath? After all, New Orleans does have a pretty decadent reputation. We must not think that because this happened there and not here that we are better than the people that live there or they are worse than us. I’m sure that some of the people who died as a result of this hurricane were atheists. But some of them were Christians. Some of them were godless. And some of them were Godly. But the wind and the rain cannot tell the difference.
In Luke 13, Jesus talked about a tower in Siloam that fell and killed a bunch of people. And He asked His disciples, “Do you think those people were worse sinners than all the rest and that is why this terrible tragedy happened to them?” And He says, “I tell you no, but unless you repent, you shall all likewise perish.”
The assumption that many people have, at least underneath, even if they don’t think this is what they think, many people assume that if something really lousy happens to you, it must be because of something you did wrong, that God is singling you out to punish you. Did God destroy New Orleans because it was a more wicked city than all the others?
Jesus doesn’t allow us to think that way. He puts that hot potato right back in our hands. All sinners deserve to die, He says, and more so, they deserve to go to hell. And it’s not our place to sit in the seat of judgment and determine who did what. Jesus tells us to be more concerned about our own status before God, to repent of our sins, lest we likewise perish. C.S. Lewis once wrote that pain is God’s megaphone. Sometimes disaster can serve as a call to repentance.
Why do bad things happen to good people? Well, the only truly good person I know about is Jesus Christ. And some very bad things did happen to Him, as you know. He was betrayed by one of His own disciples and abandoned by all of His friends right when He needed them most. He was arrested and tried for crimes He did not commit. He was savagely tortured by wicked men. No one showed Him any mercy. They pulled His beard. They spat in His face. They removed all of His clothes and nailed Him to a wooden cross for all the world to see. He was mocked by just about everyone. Even the thief dying next to Him taunted Him. Bad things happened to that good man. And even His Heavenly Father cursed Him, spat on Him, so to speak, and turned His back on Him.
Why did those bad things happen to that good man? Because He loves you and He loves me. God placed all the guilt of all the sinners who have ever lived and ever will live upon the head of His one eternal Son. And Jesus died, not because of anything He’d ever done to deserve it, but in order to serve a sentence that would be rightfully ours.
You see, Jesus paid a debt He didn’t owe, because we owed a debt we couldn’t pay. And so the next question after why do bad things happen to good people is why do good things happen to bad people? Why is God merciful and gracious to sinners? Because Jesus died for you. Why does God absolve us of our sins? Because Jesus died for you.
While there is no simple way for me to make sense out of hurricane Katrina, I can tell you this. One innocent man suffered to satisfy the wrath of God for us all and maybe one of the good things that will come out of this terrible disaster is that it will draw aimless people to the Almighty Creator who loves them so very much. In Jesus’ name. Amen.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/04/2005 01:13:00 PM
2
comments
Saturday, September 03, 2005
Ham Radio Operators Help Katrina Victims Find Family
My father-in-law, Steve Banks, is a ham radio operator and sent me this link today. It's an article that tells how hams are helping displaced people locate one another. Please pass this information along to anyone who may find it helpful.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/03/2005 12:19:00 PM
0
comments
Friday, September 02, 2005
Freedom of Speech is Dead in Canada
Here is an article that says a Canadian youth minister faces criminal charges for writing a letter to the editor in which he stated that homosexuality is morally wrong and dangerous. He is being accused of something along the lines of hate speech and is going before a Human Rights Commission (what a joke). If found guilty, which he believes is likely, he will be fined and could possibly face time in jail.
I suspect that we'll be reading such stories in the U.S. before too long. Of course, we all believe in free speech - as long as you don't offend certain people. And we all believe in freedom of religion - as long as you keep it to yourself and it doesn't affect me.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/02/2005 06:58:00 PM
3
comments
Dilbert's Discount Religion
Dilbert is, without a doubt, my favorite cartoon. Perhaps its the time I spent working in a cubicle that did it to me.
http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20050829.html
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/02/2005 06:14:00 PM
0
comments
Thursday, September 01, 2005
Horror in the Big Easy
According to the latest reports, Thursday in New Orleans saw floating corpses, gunfire and chaos. The natural disaster, the so-called "act of God," is over. The hurricane has dissipated. But now the disaster known as fallen human nature will fill the headlines. Think Mogadishu or Darfur with water. Bands of trouble-makers, armed with rifles and AK-47s looted from flooded stores are cruising the devastated city. Some for profit. Arguably some for survival. Many others just for the thrill of it. William Golding wrote Lord of the Flies because he understood that without external restraints, even the sweetest among us will turn into savages. See the dead bodies left to rot in the Louisiana summer sun. Smell the raw sewage flowing in the streets. Snakes and alligators making nests in people's submerged bedrooms and patios. How many hundreds or thousands of people will have died by drowning, dehydration, infection, dysentery, cholera or heat stroke, not to mention bullets or lack of proper medical attention?
A wise Christian lady told me today that it upsets her to think of all the petty ridiculous people (ourselves included) who moan and whine because of their insignificant problems which are seldom anything more than inconveniences when you think about it (I'm paraphrasing for dramatic effect). This should remind us that there are people with real problems.
One of the most noticable characteristics of Jesus is that he had sympathy for those who were sick or suffering. And, with God, sympathy never sits still. God so loved the world that He gave His only-begotten Son...." Did you catch that? God loved. And thus He gave Himself to save the human race. Having been saved and as people who continually benefit from the compassion of Christ, the church is mobilizing to help the hurting. Give to the effort by linking here.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/01/2005 11:37:00 PM
0
comments
International Responses to Hurricane Katrina
The United States is always one of the first nations to offer aid to other countries when they are hit with natural disasters. A few years ago, when that town in Iran was completely destroyed by a massive earthquake, the U.S. was there in droves. More recently, when those Russian submariners were trapped, the U.S. was sending in military rescue teams, pronto.
This article from the Washington Times details some of the international response to our current crisis. Needless to say, the U.S. has many friends in the world community and a number of kind offers have been made.
The perception, however, by many is that America is so rich that we need no assistance. But that isn't really the point, is it? Americans are some of the most generous people in the world. I remember reading Stephen Ambrose's books on World War II. And he says that when the Americans were finally invading Germany, the local German folk were happy to see them. And that's because they knew that the Americans, unlike the Russians or the French, would not rape their women and pillage their homes. I'm not trying to say that Americans are sinless, only that it has been a common trait of our culture to be neighborly, and that includes lending a hand when trouble strikes.
If you want to donate money to help, go here.
Hat tip to Bad Hair Blog.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
9/01/2005 12:37:00 PM
0
comments
Wednesday, August 31, 2005
Updates to the Blogroll
Folks, here are some additions to my list of confessional Lutheran bloggers:
Aardvark Alley - Because "earth pig" is one of my favorite expressions
Balaam's Ass - Because a talking jackass is something I can relate to.
Cross + Wise - Because the cross is foolishness
The Crowned Ones - Because Pr. Cholak looks like Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Kiihnworld - Because I'm ecumenical
The Lutheran Logomaniac - Because words mean things
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/31/2005 02:04:00 PM
6
comments
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
Julia Sweeney is an Atheist
Some of you may remember "Pat" from Saturday Night Live, the recurring gender-ambiguous character played brilliantly by Julia Sweeney. The joke was always that no one could tell if Pat (not to mention Pat's significant other Chris) was male or female. Let the comedy ensue. The humorously icky way that Julia Sweeney brought this favorite character to life made her famous - for a while.
Sweeney is no longer a staple on late night television, but she is in the public eye once again. Apparently, the comedian has decided that she is an atheist and is taking the stage with a new act entitled "Letting Go of God."
Now, I am truly saddened to hear of Sweeney's loss of faith and I pray for her to come around. But what irks me is how she, and soooo many others, reject Christianity and then go around talking as if they are quite knowledgeable about the subject when the evidence suggests otherwise.
My dad used to say, "It's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt." This is advice Ms. Sweeney might have taken.
In this interview from the San Francisco Gate, she discusses her disillusionment with religion. I wasn't too surprised when I read that one of the things that turned her off to Christianity is Jesus Himself. She thinks he is "angry a lot" and "hateful."
But did you notice the one example from the Gospels she attempts to cite? The story where Jesus casts demons out of someone and into a herd of pigs, who then hurl themselves off a cliff. She mistakenly claims that Jesus turned people into pigs.
First, she states that Homer's Iliad has as much or more insight than the Bible. And then - as her one example of the hatefulness of Jesus - she goes on to misquote a text found in Matthew 8. In fact, far from being an example of Jesus being mean, this story is about Jesus helping people. What bugs Sweeney most of all, she admits, is that He's not kind to animals.
Sweeney tries to act all educated and well-read when, in fact, she confuses the Bible with Homer. And not the Iliad which she refers to (notice the casual reference to smart people books), but the Odyssey. Jesus never turned people into pigs, my dear. But the witch Circe did.
It just goes to show that Sweeney, for all her talents and charms, is not a serious atheist at all. She's just ill-read.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/30/2005 04:47:00 PM
11
comments
Monday, August 29, 2005
Human "Exhibit" at London Zoo
This is exactly what's wrong with much of the environmental movement. Look at this article from Yahoo News.
Apparently, the London Zoo thinks it is a cute idea to put a handful of human volunteers, clad in little more than fig leaves, into one of their caged exhibits. Now what would be the point of that, you ask? To highlight man's place in the planet's eco-system, they say.
And what is man's place in the planet's eco-system, you ask? Well, apparently man is a "plague species." Since the article doesn't bother to explain that comment, we are left to conjecture. I have heard the idea expressed elsewhere that the human race is like a destructive virus that is consuming and destroying organism earth. There are some within the environmental movement who see the human race as - well - as bad. It's because of the growth in our population, the case is made, that our planet is enduring whatsoever ecological troubles it may be enduring. [What solution then do you think comes to mind?]
The Christian religion teaches that man (male and female) is unique in all of creation, for only man is created in the image and likeness of God. And God has given humanity dominion over the earth. We are divinely appointed the stewards of creation. And as good and faithful stewards, we should neither waste nor destroy the resources God has entrusted to our care. But to equate man with a plague or virus that is weakening and killing the planet is off kilter.
It seems to me to be a similar line of thinking as Princeton philosopher and PETA guru, Pete Singer, who says human parents should be permitted kill their infants up to 30 days past birth, but it's wrong to slay a mink or a sow. "Meat is murder," y'know.
Viewing man (male and female) as just another species of animal life with no more intrinsic value than a dog or a horse, is part of a way of thinking that underlies and advances our culture of death. The Christian assumption is that man is the pinnacle of creation, that all other creatures are for our use. All human life is sacred, not only because of our unique creation but because the eternal Son of God has become a man.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/29/2005 11:11:00 PM
2
comments
Saturday, August 27, 2005
ELCA Blogger to Check
I read (or scan) a lot of different blogs these days. The ones I tend to view daily are on my blogroll, but I have quite a number of other favorites.
Kurt Wall has been a regular reader/commenter on this blog for a bit. He has now ventured into blogging on his own. And I recommend you take a look. It's called Blogwerks.
I've never met Kurt personally (that I know of), but he strikes me as a theologically well-informed layman who loves Christ's Church and is sincerely struggling with some of the issues in his own Lutheran denomination. So pay his blog a visit and say hello.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/27/2005 02:54:00 PM
0
comments
Friday, August 26, 2005
Roger Ebert's Most Hated Films
We all know what the good movies are. What we reeeallly want to know is what are the biggest stinkers.
Here is the list of film critic Roger Ebert's most hated movies. The thing is, I really liked a couple of the ones he mentions.
My favorite quote is:This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.
That reminds me of the time when Dennis Miller was on the Tonight show and he was mocking the French. He said he'd call them scumbags except that that wouldn't be fair to bags which are filled with scum.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/26/2005 03:08:00 PM
8
comments
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Random Clutter
Here are a few goofy things that I've picked up in my scouring for news today.
- Go here to see the absolute worst album covers ever in the history of the whole world. Really. Thanks to the Commonwealth Conservative.
- Two more reasons to boycott France:
- They're attacking Lance Armstrong.
- And they use live kittens as shark bait.
- Mere Comments has info on a Narnia conference to be held in Wheaton.
- And two from Pastor Greg Alms at his blog Incarnatus Est:
- First, I can totally relate to his anxiety about numbers.
- And lastly, did you know that you can't call them manholes anymore. And people-holes just sounds rude. Click here to see the new politically correct term.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/25/2005 07:35:00 PM
0
comments
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Higher Things Photos 2005
Last month, my family and I attended the Higher Things youth conference in St. Louis. We just had a terrific time. My wife and I were both presenters. Here are some of the photos taken from the Higher Things website. You can click on the pictures to see them enlarged.
WORSHIP
Entering St. Louis Cathedral

Who is that creepy pastor?!



The Holy Eucharist at Concordia Seminary chapel. That's sem president, Dr. Dale Meyer greeting the teens after the benediction.
STUDY



There's that creepy guy again!
Rev. Todd Wilken the Bald, the radio host of Issues, Etc. gave a talk on UFOs.
FRIENDS





FUN






Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/24/2005 05:55:00 PM
5
comments
Indulge Me. Pope Grants Indulgences to Pilgrims
Here is a piece from the Houston Chronicle about Pope Benedict offering indulgences to participants of the World Day of Youth festivities. I think the article does a good job of explaining indulgences in a simple manner.
You are, no doubt, familiar with the 16th century controversy over indulgences that helped to spark the Reformation. Martin Luther nailed his 95 Thesis to the Wittenberg Church door on October 31, 1517 because he wanted to debate the practice of selling indulgences which was taking place in Germany at the time to help raise funds to build St. Peter's basilica in Rome.
The Roman Church teaches that the soul of a Christian must undergo a period of purification after death in order to be made fit to enter heaven. Unbelievers go to hell (assuming people still believe in hell). Believers go to heaven, according to Roman Catholicism, only after a period of purgation. Purgatory is the place or state where a believer's soul is purged of all its impurities.
The idea is that for every sin, there are two kinds of punishment: Temporal and Eternal. Confession and absolution remits the eternal punishments, but penance is required - either in this life or the next - to take care of the temporal punishments. However, the pope believes he can grant indulgences to shorten the span of time a person must spend suffering in purgatory.
At the time of Luther, the Dominican John Teztel (played masterfully by Alfred Molina in the recent film Luther) went about Germany selling indulgences with the slogan, "Whenever a coin in the coffer rings, a soul from purgatory springs." After Luther's complaints, even the Roman officials agreed that Tetzel had gone too far.
But if you thought indulgences were a medieval thing long gone, think again. The current pope is going to offer indulgences to people who participate in certain World Day of Youth events in Germany. But note, only those who are "attentive" will get the boon.
I love my Christian brothers and sisters in the RC church. At times, I feel like I have more in common with some of them than many of the God-lite pastors and practices infecting Lutheranism. However, my understanding of the teachings of Scripture have no room for the idea of purgatory, indulgences or penance. When I grant absolution, it is freely given. I believe that the Gospel itself (the pronouncement of forgiveness on account of Christ's sacrifice) has the power to transform hearts and purify lives. I agree that God uses the sufferings of this life to cleanse, strengthen and discipline His children. But I don't see any clear Scriptural basis for the idea that such suffering and discipline takes place for the Christian after death.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/24/2005 12:44:00 PM
3
comments
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
The Rise and Fall of the Church
Here is an interesting article from USA Today about the decline of Christianity in Western Europe. It claims that in most of Europe the only major religion that is growing is Islam.
People who know me well, know my interest in the health and growth of churches around the world. And they've heard me comment time and again on the shift that is taking place. The Church began in the Middle East and rapidly spread eastward through Turkey toward India and China. And west and south into Northern and Eastern Africa.
Then Mohammed was born in the sixth century. He and especially his followers spent the next ten centuries wreaking havoc and decimating Christian communities so that now living churches are few and far between in the Middle East and Northern Africa. What had once been a thriving Christian culture has been Islamized, and the people languish in poverty, ignorance and oppression.
Already in the apostolic age, missionaries were going north and west into Europe. As the pagan Celtic and Germanic tribes began to embrace Christianity, what we call the Middle Ages began. And though sometimes mis-characterized as dark ages, the Christian assumptions and worldview created a cultural environment from which have come great universities, astounding works of art, hospitals, literacy, democracy, and the scientific method. Then Europeans emigrated to the New World bringing their Christian faith with them.
The point I am making is that Christianity has seen stages and surges in various places and times. Once North Africa and the Middle East were filled with vibrant Christian communities. These waned and have been nearly extinguished. Then Europe became the heart of Christendom, though it's time has evidently passed. Arguably, the twentieth century was North America's turn. But signs indicate that that is waning as well.
Where is the church strong and growing? To many observers, it appears that the future strength of the church may lie in Africa, South American, possibly Eastern Europe and parts of East Asia.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/23/2005 06:00:00 PM
5
comments
Monday, August 22, 2005
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) Convention News
The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) is the largest Lutheran body in the United States with something near 5 million members. I am a pastor with the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod (LCMS) with about 2.5 million.
The ELCA recently concluded their biennial convention at which several controversial resoltuions were under consideration. I'd like to do my best to give a brief summary of two items of interest with some links for further information.
- A New Hymnal. I subscribe to the notion that the manner of one's worship is symbiotically related to the content of one's beliefs. In Latin, Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi. Worship forms matter. The LCMS, at its convention last summer, adopted a new hymnal which will come out in 06. From what I've seen, it has some weaknesses and many strengths.
This summer, the ELCA adopted a new hymnal as well. According to reports, their new worship book contains some very serious theological flaws. The chief concern I have read about is the increasing use of gender neutral language in reference to the Deity. I am understanding of the desire to use gender-sensitive language in many situations and forms of communication. But I think it is intolerable to go out of one's way to neuter God. God has revealed Himself to us as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. And that was not arbitrary or his attempt to be culturally sensitive to patriarchal ancient near easterners. God is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Of course, that is not the only manner in which God is named in the Scripture, but it is a highly significant one. The hubris it requires to reject God's name - Father, Son and Holy Spirit - in favor of something that won't offend Gloria Steinem is astonishing.
The formula for performing baptisms given to us by our Lord is "in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit." I wonder what this new worship book will do in its baptismal rites. Probably make this traditional name an option, among others.
I will go so far as to say that I would not consider a baptism done with any other formulation for God's name than "Father, Son, Spirit" to be a Christian baptism.
- The second, and more widely publicized, issue has to do with homosexuality. I am not familiar with all of the history of this particular question in the ELCA. And what I have read has been byzantine in its complexity, at least to me.
Basically, there has been a movement to ordain practicing homosexuals and bless homosexual unions. Many in the grassroots, naturally, have not been as supportive of this drive as the members of the various task forces, special committees, etc.
As I understand the matter, this was debated extensively at their convention and the final decisions are seen as something as a compromise. I have read varying interpretations of what was finally passed, so it seems likely that even many of the delegates may be unclear on the remifications of what they've done. It looks to me as if they've created their own version of don't ask / don't tell, giving local ministries and bishops leeway to do what they believe pastorally responsible. If you ask me, this is going to result in further chaos. As it says in Judges, each man does what is right in his own eyes.
Dr. Gene Veith, Culture Editor for World magazine writes this about the inclusive language hymnal.
Rev. Dr. Holger Sonntag is an LCMS pastor who'd formerly attended an ELCA seminary. He has his doctorate in New Testament studies from a German university. He writes this incisive article, posted on Rev. Paul McCain's cyber-brethren blog.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/22/2005 04:42:00 PM
1 comments
Sunday, August 21, 2005
On Being Mr. Critical
One reader made a thoughtful comment on one of my previous posts asking me about how I can point my finger at the errorists in other church bodies while my own denomination has plenty of issues as well. His comment was polite, yet challenging. And I thank him for it because I have been thinking about it since then. So I would like to take a moment to get a couple of things off my chest.
- First of all, for the most part, in this blog I post commentary about current events, pop culture, and news from the international church scene. And just as a train wreck will get more coverage than a birth announcement, my commentary probably tends more towards negatives than positives. I don't think I'm a curmudgeon, but if that's how I come across, please grant your indulgence.
- Secondly, I certainly do not believe that my church body (the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod) is perfect or free of problems. Oh, we have some doozies! Generally, however, I will refrain from directly addressing specific issues in the LCMS on this blog. For various reasons, I do not believe this blog is the best forum for me to air those matters. But don't think this means I avoid taking a stand when necessary. I do and I have and I will. But probably not on a blog. So when I nag or complain or rebuke others, it is not because I believe I am personally sinless or superior or that my own denomination is perfect.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/21/2005 11:34:00 PM
6
comments
Saturday, August 20, 2005
Guess Which Movie
This website is kind of fun for movie buffs. It's pretty tough, but I did pretty well on the first two rounds. It gives you a couple of obscure shots from a movie and then you have to guess the name of the film.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/20/2005 11:06:00 PM
0
comments
Friday, August 19, 2005
African Bishop Calls for the Church of England to be Suspended from Anglicanism
Peter Akinola is the influential Anglican Primate of Nigeria who has been most outspoken against the Episcopal Church - USA for consecrating an openly homosexual bishop. Now he's at it again, persistent fellow. Apparently, the Church of England passed some goofy rule allowing their gay priests to get married as long as they promise not to have gay sex with their partners. Isn't that one of the stupidest things you've ever heard? Just how do they plan to enforce that? What's the point? Because of such craziness, Archbishop Akinola is recommending that the Church of England be suspended from the Anglican Communion. Just you wait. Soon we'll be hearing people calling him divisive. Here's the article.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/19/2005 11:42:00 PM
4
comments
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Brad Pitt's Anti-Semitic Movie
Well, I don't know that for certain. Let's put it this way, Brad Pitt and Paramount Pictures are set to make a film entitled, The Year of Living Biblically. The stated premise is that the main character determines to follow all the rules of the Old and New Testaments literally (gasp!). I think it's a fair assumption that this is not going to make people like me look good.
Some grouchy unenlightened commentators are saying this is likely to just be another swipe at conservative Christians. Maybe. But if I were an Orthodox Jew, like say, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I'd definitely be paying attention.
I took the Jewish angle because it is considered suave and fashionable to mock conservative Christians. Jews get slightly more respect nowadays. Of course, if you really want to be the darling of Hollywood, go Buddhist or better yet, adopt the religion of Sheila-ism. You remember that woman named Sheila who made up a new religion entirely based around herself. That's what most of us reeeeaaalllyy are anyway, no matter where we sit on Sunday morning (or Saturday or whatever).
It's a free country. Let them make whatever movie they please. But when a film intentionally mocks a major world religion (mine or yours), I would expect outcry. Didn't Voltair once say, "I may not agree with what you say. . . and if I don't you can expect me bust your chops"? I may not have that quote exactly right.
Hey, I'm no stick in the mud. I can appreciate a certain level of irreverent humor. But making fun of God's Word is dangerous.
I read one report that suggested a movie called something like The Year of Living Koran-ly. Like that would ever happen. But it does. Everytime you see one of those blow-em-up action flicks where the bad guys are Islamic terrorists, you are watching a movie about people who try to live according to the Koran literally. Read it, if you don't believe me.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/18/2005 11:59:00 PM
4
comments
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
"Da Vinci Crock," I Mean "Code"
I was so delighted when I heard a while back that the Anglican officials refused to give permission for Ron Howard to make his newest movie in Westminster Abbey. The Da Vinci Code movie, based on the Dan Brown book of the same name will star Tom Hanks and seems to be nearing completion. Then I read this bit from Mere Comments by James Kushiner.
Apparently, not all Anglicans are willing to turn revisionistic, historically illiterate hacks away from using their church properties to slander Jesus. At least not when 100,000 British pounds come into the picture. Yes, a Rev. Alec Knight has allowed the filmmakers to use Lincoln Cathedral. And, of course, the church will be rewarded handsomely.
Sadly, the modern Church of England - as a whole - is not particularly known for its concern for getting the Jesus stuff right, but I was encouraged by a rare bit of backbone shown by the caretakers of Westminster Abbey. [There's the old joke: Why does the bishop lay his hands on the head of the new ordinand? It's easier to remove his spine.] Then I read about this Lincoln Cathedral business. After all, what's integrity when you've got to pay the gas bills each month?
I have read The Da Vinci Code. I have also read other books by Dan Brown. Assuming Ron Howard's film follows the book at all, it will be a horrible movie. It makes me sad, frankly. The people the Church is called to minister to, and the world in which this takes place, is increasingly ignorant of Biblical content. 'Tis a fact. And we're even less well-informed, I think, about the history of Western Civilization. I have spoken to far too many people whose primary (or secondary) source of religious information is T.V. and film. People figure, why do I need to go to Bible study or get my kids involved in church? We go on X-mas and Easter, sorta.
It's one thing to write a novel. It's quite another to write a novel about actual historical subjects without evidence of genuine research and filled with errors any 9th grader a hundred years ago would've been able to spot and then publicly claim to be writing true stuff. Someone said, "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing." Dan Brown is the poster boy for that slogan. He takes a bit of fact and goes bonkers with it. Gee, buy an encyclopedia already.
Y'know those people who watch Battlestar Gallactica on television and soak in its underlying mythology of how ancient space aliens populated the earth and built the pyramids - - and believe it's true? That's what The Da Vinci Code is doing for many people concerning the historical person of Jesus Christ.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/17/2005 08:16:00 PM
5
comments
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
Tom Cruise on Psychiatry
This evening, as I was re-reading the post I put up yesterday, it occured to me that one of my comments (at least) was not as clear as it should have been and could be misleading. I wrote:
Or how about when Tom Cruise (whom I believe to be a terrific actor)
lectured America - in a profoundly inarticulate verbal belch - on the validity
of psychiatric medicine?
That was one sentence in a post about celebrities who spout off on subjects they are poorly informed about. But it dawned on me, as I re-read my words, that my statement could be understood to say that Tom Cruise believes in the validity of psychiatric medicine and I think he's an ignoramus for it. The fact is, I intended to convey the opposite.
Tom Cruise, as a devoted Scientologist, thinks that all psychiatric medicine is quakery. As you may know, he got into quite a ridiculous showdown with Matt Lauer on the Today show over the matter. Go here to read the transcript of that broadcast.
You see, I believe that psychiatry - and the use of antidepressant drugs, in particular - have genuine merit. And I criticize Cruise, and all of his Scientology weirdo friends, for trashing it all entirely. That's a dangerous religion, people.
Some will point to the checkered history of psychiatry. Sure, there are plenty of horror tales and examples of cruelty in psychiatry. But the practice of medicine is an art as much as a science. Name one single field of medicine that doesn't have a freaked out past. I'm sure that in a hundred years - when medical knowledge and technology will contain wonders we can't even dream about now - our great-grandchildren will consider us barbarians for allowing surgeons to actually cut on us with knives. Ooooooh!
The brain is an organ of the body. And like all the other organs, it can malfunction, get sick and respond to treatment. It does get a bit tricky, I realize, because we have to deal with the mind/brain connection. Healing of the mind and healing of the brain go hand in hand, but they are not identical. Clearly, I am of the opinion that the Holy Spirit, the sacraments, and trust in the promises of God's Word bring peace and comfort and aid to the troubled mind.
But I am also quite convinced that maladies such as Schizophrenia, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Depression, and others can and do respond to medical treatment, including drugs. I thank God for the ongoing developments in treating mental illnesses just as much as I thank him for the x-ray and the polio vaccine.
I'm not saying a person shouldn't exercise caution before undergoing psychiatric treatment. An individual should read and study up on any medication before they take it, psychiatric or otherwise.
But instead of blasting people for taking such meds, as Cruise did, we - especially we in the church - should show compassion toward the sick and those afflicted with mental illness and support them with our love, prayers and actions.
If you, or someone in your family, is mentally ill (or you suspect may be), let me tell you about an excellent organization whose work I highly champion. It's called the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill. They are a wonderful source of information, direction and support, not just for those with mental illness, but for their family and friends as well.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/16/2005 11:14:00 PM
1 comments
Monday, August 15, 2005
Bono, Celebrities, and Stuff of Substance
[Warning: Glaring generalization ahead] Most of the time, when I hear celebrities commenting on religion or ethics, I know I'm going to need to crack open another bottle of Pepcid AC. Even if I kinda like the person, I frequently wince on account of their breathtaking ignorance of the subjects they choose to comment on. I know this will be a splash of cold water for some, but having your face on GQ or Seventeen doesn't make one an authority on the crisis in the Sudan, epidemiology, or bio-ethics. I'm no expert on most of that stuff either, but I hope I generally know when to plug the hole in my face. One gets the impression that most celebrity Mensa candidates wouldn't know an ebola virus if it challenged them to an arm wrestle. Take for instance, the lovely and talented young actress, Scarlet Johansonn who recently opined that fetal stem cell research is necessary so that we can find cures for such scourges against humanity as polio, etc. Huh? Polio is under control, my dear, and no one had to carve up fetuses to do it. (On that, check out the recent research from Pittsburgh's Children's Hospital which shows that adult, or post-natal, stem cells are as useful for medical research as fetal stem cells.)
Or how about when Tom Cruise (whom I believe to be a terrific actor) lectured America - in a profoundly inarticulate verbal belch - on the validity of psychiatric medicine? This is the guy who believes that the source of all our problems is that we're all infected with spiritual cooties from ancient space aliens. He's not in the best position to call anyone a quack.
Everyone has a right to his or her opinions and I am an ardent believer in freedom of speech. But that is not to excuse pomposity, an inflated sense of self-importance or grinding stubborn ignorance.
My dad used to tell me that it is better to keep your mouth closed and be thought an idiot than to open it and remove all doubt. I've said and done enough stupid things myself to see his point.
[Alert: Refreshing exception ahead] While bags and bags of Hollywood celebrity types are too pampered and self-indulgent to form a meaningful sentence on their own, there are refreshiing exceptions. Readers of this blog have seen my relatively high regard for Bono, the lead singer of perhaps the most famous rock band in action today, U2. Now there is a man who has held AIDS babies and slept beneath mosquito netting.
Christianity Today has given us these excerpts of an interview he did some time ago. You must go here too, while you're at it. And though I don't agree with everything he says, I am pleased to know that at least one hugely influential celebrity is more than chrome-plated faddish activism. His positions on religion and human care go beyond deciding which color of ribbon to wear on his Armani tuxedo to the Wolfgang Puck after-party.
I believe Bono has some truly lucid insights on the person of Jesus Christ and His work as Savior. He seems to have a very accurate and personal understanding of the atonement and his thoughts on Karma vs. Grace sound a lot like, in my vocabulary, Law and Gospel. In fact, some of his comments in this interview are 10 times better than the flacid drivel most American preachers drool out every Lord's day. Take two and half minutes and read it. He even does a bit of C.S. Lewis.
Now I'm not recommending we give the man a blue-ribbon for Lutheran orthodoxy in every point, but I'm certain there has never been a more serious thinking or theologically articulate rock star in the "history of the whole world" (as Bunnie Diehl likes to say). Now that is a celebrity that I'd love to have a beer or three with sometime . . . oh, and Mel too.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/15/2005 11:50:00 PM
3
comments
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
Is the Nation Really in Favor of Abortion?
Friend and fellow Lutheran blogger, Bunnie Diehl, has made an excellent point here. She cites an article by Matt Kaufman at Boundless magazine. Basically, the point is that if the country is so clearly pro-abortion, as the prophets of death proclaim, then why are they so worried that Roe v. Wade will be overturned? As Kaufman explains it, a reversal of Roe v. Wade would only re-grant the individual states the right to enact their own abortion laws. So what does NARAL have to worry about? If their analysis of the population's views is correct, then reversing Roe v. Wade should have little or no effect on the actual availability of abortion. Unless, of course, the constantly touted statistics about how much Americans love abortion are skewed and misleading. I propose that underneath their bluster, the death merchants realize that the American people would prefer there to be much greater restictions on abortion rights . . . if actually given a say in the matter.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/10/2005 04:12:00 PM
0
comments
Friday, August 05, 2005
"Til Death Do Us Part" or Whatever
An article at FoxNews.com addresses a disturbing trend in wedding vows. It appears that instead of the traditional 'Til death do us part," some couples today are opting for these much less permanent-sounding alternatives:
- "For as long as we continue to love each other."
- "For as long as our time shall last."
- "For as long as we are together."
If you want to go that route, why prettify the language? Why not just say what you really mean? "Until I get sick of you," or "Until someone better comes along," or "As long as I'm not bored, inconvenienced, or unhappy."
Marriage is a life-long union of one man and one woman. Divorce happens and I understand that. That is evidence of the brokenness of creation. All of us children of Adam are sinful and do sinful things. In some circumstances, divorce may actually be the lesser of two evils. It can be very complicated. Divorce, when it happens in the church, should be addressed with loving application of Law and Gospel (Call to repentance and Absolution). Compassion must be shown to those whose hearts, lives and homes are broken. But to begin your life together publicly acknowledging that "hey, we're gonna give it a shot, but this gig may not work out y'know," is insane. What kind of commitment is that?
Human marriage is an image of the relationship between Christ and His Bride, the Holy Church. If I look in a carnival mirror, my face may be all elongated and distorted in funny ways. But thankfully, that's not how I really am. Honest. Human marriage, after being expelled from Eden, is sadly often a warped reflection of the beautiful thing it is meant to display.
What would our Lord's wedding vows sound like? "I will love you with an everlasting love," or "I'll stick this out until someone with shaplier legs saunters by?"
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/05/2005 11:19:00 PM
11
comments
Thursday, August 04, 2005
Human Fetuses and Panda Babies
David Mills, over at Mere Comments, reminds us of a very important principle in this illuminating post: that it matters how we say what we say. If words are units of thought, then the word choices one makes presumably reflect particular ideas.
He cites two Associated Press articles from August 3, 2005.
"A 13-year-old giant panda gave birth to a cub at San Diego Zoo, but a second
baby died in the womb, officials said Wednesday."--Associated Press, Aug. 3
"A cancer-ravaged woman robbed of consciousness by a stroke has given birth after being kept on life support for three months to give her fetus extra time to develop."--Associated Press, Aug. 3
A number of years ago, I read the book by Dr. Jean Garton called Who Broke the Baby? It opened my eyes to the importance of the language we choose to employ, particularly in controversial debates.
So am I pro-life or anti-abortion? Actually, I am both. But being pro-life includes so much more than just being opposed to abortion. Is it a fetus or a baby? It's both, but to exclusively use the word "fetus" for a pre-born child when the common parlance would be to call it a baby (as the panda story demonstrates) is to reflect a certain bias.
This is also why we should call the process of baby-making procreation rather than reproduction. The first term suggests the miracle of life, that a man and a woman participate in God's creation of a new human being. The second term is about production. A baby is a product. It brings to mind assembly lines and heavy industry.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/04/2005 10:58:00 PM
4
comments
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Mega-Churches, II
A few days ago, I posted on the mega-church phenom. Then I noticed that Darrell, over at Southern Conservative, posted this very interesting bit on his and his wife's experiences. He was kind enough to link to me, so I thought the least I could do would be to return the favor. I want you read what he writes so that you won't think my post was just the product of a grumpy Lutheran pastor. Oh, I may be a Mr. Cranky-Pants every once in a while, but not this time.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/03/2005 10:46:00 PM
2
comments
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
John Garang is Killed
This is bad news from the Sudan. Check out the story here. As many of you may know, I have had an interest in the Sudan for a number of years now. My good friend, Rev. Andrew Elisa, is the head pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in the Sudan. And I was privileged to go on a short-term mission trip to Yambio and Baguga in February 2004.
Dr. John Garang was killed earlier this week in a helicopter crash. Garang was the leader of the Sudanese People's Libertaion Movement (SPLM) and its military arm, the Sudanese People's Liberation Army (SPLA).
For 21 years, the Sudan has been engaged in civil war. The militantly Islamic government in Khartoum tried to implement sharia law on all of the people of the Sudan. The majority of the people in the southern part of the country are Christians or animists and resisted the forced islamization.
With help from U.S. special envoy, John Danforth, a long overdue peace agreement was signed in January. Part of the deal was that Garang would become the Vice President of the whole country and in 6 years a vote would be taken to determine whether the Sudan would remain one united nation or become two separate entities.
Garang's death is being called a tragic accident and that is probably the case. But since numerous attempts have been made on his life, his supporters were initially crying foul. Terrible riots followed in Khartoum, leaving many dead.
Please pray for peace in the Sudan. And pray for the persecuted Christians there and in many places around the globe.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/02/2005 11:17:00 PM
2
comments
Monday, August 01, 2005
All We, Like Sheep, Have Gone Astray
The prophet Isaiah knew what he was talking about when he penned the words above in Isaiah 53:6. I came across a story that is a couple of weeks old by now, so maybe you've read it, but I thought it merited some further attention.
Somewhere in Turkey, while the sheep-herders were doing lunch, one of the sheep munched and grazed himself up to the edge of a ravine and then over the edge. He fell to his death. But the thing about sheep is that they are natural followers. So one after another, the sheep followed the animals before them. And this continued until 1500 sheep went off the cliff. Hundreds died. Many of the later ones survived on account of the cushiony soft bed of wool that was formed.
Sheep tend to wander, not always paying attention to where they're going, simply going after the next tuft of grass and following the herd. In what sense, then, are we like sheep? Maybe in the sense that we are governed more by our appetites than by the voice of the Shepherd or good reasoning. Maybe in the sense that we tend to define what's right or wrong by the standards of our society. And certainly in the sense that we will plummet to our destruction, by our own fault... without the intervention of a Good Shepherd, that is.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
8/01/2005 05:49:00 PM
2
comments
Saturday, July 30, 2005
New Japanese Android - You'll Forget She's Not Human
So I stumbled on this article today about Japanese scientists who have created the most life-like human-looking robot yet. Several times throughout the article, it says something like, "one day, we'll have androids that will fool us into thinking they're human." And all I could think of to respond was, "Why in the world would we want that!?" Robots don't have to fool us into thinking they are alive in order to perform the typical mundane or dangerous tasks or to rove across the surface of Mars.
Might there be some beneficial uses for a life-like android? Sure. Spies might use them to infiltrate cells of bad guys. They'd make swell decoys for the military. I'm sure perverts could come up with something. And the late night talk show host prospects are enormous!
But do you really want to live in a world where you can't easily be certain if the person you are speaking to, working under or flirting with isn't a machine?!
Long ago, some people thought they were pretty smart and determined to demonstrate their genius by building a tower to the heavens. "Let us make a name for ourselves," they said. The pagan Greeks called this kind of pride hubris. It always leads to tragedy. In Genesis 11, God confused the language of the people in the land of Shinar to derail their grandiose schemes. It seems to me that - at times - modern science doesn't know when to stop. Life-like androids may not quite raise the ethical questions of cloning or genetic engineering, but like all the best sci-fi movies prove: The wise man is cautious in the realm of science. Not everything that can be done, should be done. You can never predict all the outcomes of your inventions.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/30/2005 08:41:00 PM
5
comments
Friday, July 29, 2005
Mega-churches Mega-Bad?
Clint Rainey is a journalism student at the University of Texas. His piece for Dallasnews.com on the inadequacy of megachurches is on the mark. He decries the Church Growthy lust for razzle-dazzle, all in the name of being "seeker sensitive." Mr. Rainey questions what the mega-churches are trying to attract seekers to. Certainly not religion. Certainly not doctrine. Certainly not objective truth. Certainly not Jesus. Rather than having seeker-sensitive buildings, services, programs, music, and kitsch, let's try being seeker-sensitive Christians he advises. There's a kernel of wisdom in that, yes?
I would add that instead of being seeker-sensitive, let's be genuinely warm, honest, welcoming Christian people who focus on the cross and, as a church, embody the Spirit of God. Then he who seeks, will have something worth finding.
I'll probably get in trouble for saying this and maybe it's just me, but in my experience (and I say this often), the Christians who yammer the most about reaching the lost and want to use every trendy gimmick to do it, those that belong to the Church-of-What's-Happenin-Now, are just not that nice. At least not to me. While the stodgy, stuffy, sticks-in-the-mud I like to hang out with are quite warm and genuine. At least I know what they think.
The point is that the mega-church movement, in addition to being impersonal, is shallow. A mile wide and a nanometer deep. Offering feel-good self-improvement with a glossy spiritual veneer. Mr. Rainey criticizes the boomer generation responsible for mega-church-mania, saying they seek after "stuff" and "things" when they come to church. It's a generalization, to be sure, but I think he's right. I hope Mr. Rainey is equally correct in his assessment of his own generation, one that is coming to church, insofar as it does come to church, looking for "meaning."
Oh, just read his article.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/29/2005 11:32:00 PM
10
comments
Thursday, July 28, 2005
Batman Began
Today is our 15th wedding anniversary. And a grand decade-and-a-half it's been. To celebrate I took my lovely bride out to eat at an elegant Spanish restaurant I know. It's called Mallorca and is on the southside area of town. The food is outstanding and the service is second-to-none. I asked one of our servers where she was from; the accent was unfamiliar to me. Portugal, she says.
After dinner, we headed over to the new movie theater nearby to see Batman Begins. I wanted to see War of the Worlds but that would've gotten us home too late for the babysitter. However, both of us liked Batman more than we thought we would.
Weakness: Katie Holmes. I'm sorry; I'm sure she's a very nice person and is talented, to be sure. But she just didn't convince me that she was one of the lonely fighters for goodness in Gotham City. Too young or too cute or something. Not strong enough.
Strengths: The rest of the cast. Morgan Freeman is still probably one of the best actors in the history of the whole world. Michael Caine is another sure hit, in my book. Liam Neeson, another favorite. And Gary Oldman, gotta love im. He probably played the best Dracula in the history of the whole world.
Mr. Christian Bales did a fine job. Nice steely gaze he's got going on there. Needs to work on the other 35 zillion facial expressions though. Nonetheless, he's done Batman better than anyone else I've ever seen.
I applaud the writers and director for getting away from the Willie Wonka-ness of Tim Burton which was turning the series into nothing but camp. Each episode was getting more embarrassing than the last. The spooky creepiness does it better justice, I say. But then again, I'm partial to spooky creepy things in general. [I also like my beer, coffee, and chocolate to be dark and bitter to match my persona.]
It can't be easy to make a comic book superhero movie that works. If I put on a cape and a mask, you'd laugh your heads off. But this film, like few others, makes the absurd believable. Huzzah for that!
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/28/2005 11:57:00 PM
6
comments
Wednesday, July 27, 2005
Meditations in Tombstone (Arizona)
One of the fun-est things I did while working as a seminary recruitment officer back in the olden days was make a sidetrip to Tombstone, Arizona. I'd been in Tucson meeting with prospective students at a Lutheran church when I noticed the famed Western town nearby on the map. I had a half day I could afford to kill so I hustled on down there.
For reasons I cannot quite identify, I have long been fascinated with the legendary gunfight at the OK corral where Wyatt Earp, his brothers and Doc Holliday whooped the Clanton boys. So the opportunity to walk those same dusty streets was too good to pass up. I was not disappointed. The route there was right through the deadest and hottest desert I'd ever been in. This was before I had a cell phone and I actually got a bit nervous on that lonely road. If my car were to stall, I pictured myself becoming buzzard bait.
The first thing I did was visit the cemetery on Boot Hill, hoping to read some of the famously funny epitaphs. One said:
Here lies Lester Moore
Four slugs from a .44
No Les no More
Re-read that once or twice until the macabre humor of it dawns on you. I was also struck by the great number of Chinese buried there, railroad workers I'd imagine. And the high number of infants and very small children.
Oh, I did a few other touristy things. Had a snort at one of the local watering holes. Saw the presumed site of the OK Corral and watched a re-enactment of the gunfight.
This all comes to mind again because I re-watched the movie Tombstone from the early 90s starring Kurt Russell and Val Kilmer, plus an unmistakable Billy Bob Thornton in a throwaway role. There've been better Westerns than this. And those are not my favorite actors (though I do confess that Kilmer should've gotten an Oscar for his Doc Holliday). It's moderately accurate historically, however and not un-entertaining.
Why I am writing this? I'm curious. What is it about gunfighting, bloodlusting murderers like Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday (or Tony Soprano for that matter) that makes them almost iconic figures for Americans? It's not the classic good vs. evil dynamic because these yahoos were every bit as vicious as anyone they ever felled. Maybe it's just the testosterone effect.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/27/2005 01:22:00 PM
12
comments
Tuesday, July 26, 2005
Higher Things Photo
This is me delivering my in-depth sectional at the Higher Things youth conference last week in St. Louis. My topic was Christ in Fantasy Lit and Movies. The room seated 300 and we had maybe 200 or 250. The technology available was excellent. I used Powerpoint for the first time (only had a couple of goof-ups). But the techies were on the mark.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/26/2005 04:48:00 PM
9
comments
Monday, July 25, 2005
Episcopal Bishop Cans Conservative Priest
Some time ago, I wrote about a storm brewing among Connecticut Episcopalians. A handful of conservative-ish priests and their parishes objected to their bishop, Andrew Smith, participating in the consecration of an openly gay bishop in 2003. They requested to be placed under the ecclesiastical supervision of a more conservative bishop, as an alternative to being under Smith's oversight, something that Episcopal polity allows. When Smith refused to allow that, six congregations began withholding their offerings to the national church.
Well, here is what happened next. I'm here summarizing an article in the latest WORLD magazine. In March, Bishop Smith suspended the six priests. But they rejected his discipline and continued to minister to their congregations. Further, they protested Bishop Smith's oversight by asserting that he would not be welcome to preach or administer the sacraments in their parishes.
Then at 9:30 a.m. on July 13, Bishop Smith and his stormtroopers raided St. John's Episcopal Church in Bristol, Conn., the church of Rev. Mark Hansen, one of the six dissenters. They pried open Father Hansen's office door, confiscated all church records, shut down the congregation's website redirecting traffic to the diocesan site. They changed the locks on all the doors and announced to the congregation that Hansen was no longer their pastor and a Susan McCone would now be in charge. To add insult to injury, Rev. Hansen is forbidden to set foot on the church property or even to communicate with any of the church members.
Bishop Smith claimed that the dissenting priests had "abandoned the communion" when they protested against his spiritual oversight of their parishes. Now if that isn't the pot calling the kettle every shade of black.
Every 10 years, the worldwide Anglican communion holds their Lambeth Conference, a meeting of bishops which governs the church. At the last Lambeth Conference, in 1998, the bishops voted overwhelmingly that homosexual practice is "incompatible with Scripture." Add to this the fact that the Anglican primates (chief bishops) met recently and scolded the Episcopal Church USA for consecrating an openly gay bishop and placed a suspension on the entire EC-USA. If the EC-USA does not repent of its action, it may very well be booted from the Anglican communion entirely.
So let me see if I have this straight. The primate bishops of world Anglicanism condemned the consecration in which Smith participated and which Hansen protests. And the most recent meeting of the highest governing council (Lambeth) in Anglicanism declared homosexual practice to be contrary to the Scripture. These are decisions that Rev. Mark Hansen and his congregation agree with. Yet, Bishop Smith says that Hansen is the one being divisive? Woe to those who call evil good and good evil.
This just goes to prove, that in liberal Christianity, everything is tolerated...except conservatives.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/25/2005 08:41:00 PM
4
comments
Sunday, July 24, 2005
The Barren Cross or the Crucifix?

Fellow blogger, Rev. Paul McCain, has posted an exceptional piece answering whether Lutherans prefer crucifixes or bare crosses. Go here for that. It is a frequent misconception that Lutherans, lumped in with Reformed churches, oppose the use of a crucifix (that is a cross with the statue of Jesus on it). Nothing could be further from the truth. Crucifixes universally adorned Lutheran altars until about 50 years ago.
I did hear a Lutheran pastor one time say that we shouldn't use the crucifix because, y'know, Jesus isn't still on the cross. This is to suggest that a bare cross somehow reflects the bodily resurrection of Jesus. But I have NEVER understood this reasoning. Rev. McCain rightly points out that the cross would have been empty whether Jesus rose from the tomb or not. I have also often noted that Christians who object to the crucifix on the grounds that Jesus is not still on the cross seem to have no trouble with nativity scenes. Is Jesus still in the manger?
I think the real problem is a malady that I have termed Romo-phobia. (This is the new favorite word of fellow Pgh blogger Ales Rarus.) Frankly, I think we should leave the matter up to Christian liberty. But my personal vote is for the crucifix as a superior means of illustrating the basis of our salvation.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/24/2005 05:08:00 PM
11
comments
Saturday, July 23, 2005
How to Argue About Jesus
The highlight of the past week in St. Louis with the Higher Things Youth Conference was undoubtedly the worship. You haven't lived until you've heard 1200 teenagers absolutely belting out all 10 verses of Salvation Unto Us has Come. People who say that you can't use traditional liturgy and hymnody with youth simply do not know what they are talking about.
I was the preacher at one of the services so I was sitting in the front able to see the faces of the congregation. And I can tell you that these high school men and women were singing and chanting away with gusto. They were, as a whole, more attentive and engaged than any congregation of adults I have ever witnessed - except for when I was in the Sudan.
But the other big strength of this week's conference were the sectionals. Since my wife and I were both leading sectionals ourselves, I did not have the opportunity to sit in on others as I would have liked. I did catch two superb presentations however.
Rev. Todd Wilken, of the Issues Etc. radio broadcast gave a fun and interesting presentation on UFOs.
But I was also deeply impressed with Pastor Klemet Preus's sectional entitled: How to Argue About Jesus. The room he was in seated 300 people. And I would guess that there were 350 in attendance. The title is intentionally provocative. "Argue" sounds so negative. And aren't Christians supposed to be positive people all the time?
But Pr. Preus does us a favor by defining argument for us as simply explaining the reasons one has for one's beliefs. And then arguing about Jesus becomes not only acceptable, but a biblical mandate for all Christians. Essentially, this was a presentation on critical thinking, logic and debate in relation to spreading the Christian message. Preus clarified that we only fight because we don't know how to argue.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/23/2005 12:25:00 PM
1 comments
Friday, July 22, 2005
Higher Things Youth Ministry Update
Hey all, I apologize for being quiet the past few days. But as I'd mentioned, I've been in St. Louis all week with the Higher Things Youth Conference. And it has gone fabulously well! The sectionals are meaty and interesting. The worship is excellent. And the campus of St. Louis University is a very good facility for this sort of thing.
I did a three-day in-depth sectional on religious/worldview themes in pop culture. My first foray into the world of Powerpoint. I only had one major glitch and that was the day I forgot to plug in the laptop. So I got about three quarters of the way through my presentation and then *blink,* lights out baby! Apparantly, batteries don't last indefinitely.
I will say this. Higher Things is the finest Lutheran youth ministry I have ever encountered or been involved with. The level of biblical teaching that is taking place is out of sight. And I have to say that I have been extremely impressed with the theological integrity and knowledge and maturity of the teens I've met.
One thing floored me on the first day of my presentation. At the end, after talking about movies and such for 45 minutes, I made a side comment that maybe we'd all be better off if we frankly just turned off the blasted TV sets and read a book. And 200 teenagers applauded. I, for one, am glad they are the future and many of the current generation of leaders will soon be the past.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/22/2005 12:36:00 PM
2
comments
Monday, July 18, 2005
Higher Things Youth Ministry
On my way to the Higher Things Lutheran youth conference in St. Louis, MO where I'll be preaching and delivering some sectionals.
It seems to me that youth ministry, at its best, does three things well:
- Worship
- Teaching
- Fun
We do all three, but we know how to keep them separate.
In a time when entertainment is seen by many as the highest good, much that passes for youth ministry actually does little to hand on the Christian faith. The new book Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers points out that the average American teenager, even those that regularly attend "conservative" churches, actually knows very little of the substance of Christian doctrine. The authors describe the typical teen as a Moralistic Therapeutic Deist.
I had a parishoner one time ask me, "Why do we feel like we have to 'fun-ize' everything?" Good question. It seems to me that we should be able to have a good time in youth ministry, to enjoy ourselves, but also know the difference between a rock concert and a worship service, between a video game and a Bible study.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/18/2005 09:52:00 AM
8
comments
Sunday, July 17, 2005
Fantasy Book and Films: Good and Bad
I have been doing a bit of research lately for a three-part presentation I'm doing next week in St. Louis for 1200 teenagers. My topic is fantasy lit and movies. I will incorporate everything from sci-fi to horror to comic book superheroes to what I'd call fantasy proper: Narnia, Lord of the Rings, and Harry Potter.
And I came across this very helpful article by Dr. Gene Edward Veith entitled: Good Fantasy and Bad Fantasy. I recommend it to you highly. It is a pdf file, so be alert to that before you click on it. I'm sure you could find it in html on the net.
Posted by
Pastor Scott Stiegemeyer
at
7/17/2005 04:00:00 PM
0
comments
