tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11610171.post114628895436177693..comments2023-09-27T09:56:45.943-04:00Comments on The Burr in the Burgh: God Does, In Fact, Reject PeoplePastor Scott Stiegemeyerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16673629123931502344noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11610171.post-1147152209643926382006-05-09T01:23:00.000-04:002006-05-09T01:23:00.000-04:00... and apply the other half Aardie here.... and apply the other half <B><A HREF="http://aardvarkalley.blogspot.com/2006/05/new-month-of-aardies.html" REL="nofollow">Aardie</A></B> here.Orycteropus Aferhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06778932701096220808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11610171.post-1146457086178245562006-05-01T00:18:00.000-04:002006-05-01T00:18:00.000-04:00I recall Dr Korby having commentedon sin: "The pop...I recall Dr Korby having commented<BR/>on sin: "The pope doesn't know what<BR/>sin is". Judging from the UCC ads,<BR/>the dear Dr. could also include this "church" body, couldn't he?!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11610171.post-1146378757658421202006-04-30T02:32:00.000-04:002006-04-30T02:32:00.000-04:00The ad is, of course, despicable in its dishonesty...The ad is, of course, despicable in its dishonesty. Yet when considered from the standpoint of objective justification, it gives the correct answer to the question it asks. It just isn't asking the question it thinks its asking.<BR/><BR/>Does God reject people? No. Do people reject God? Yes. And that includes several classes of people the UCC and other liberal churches lie to by telling them that they're doing anything other than rejecting God by <BR/>making choices He's made clear have exactly that significance.Robert Elart Watershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18182251436190781481noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11610171.post-1146347363500844852006-04-29T17:49:00.000-04:002006-04-29T17:49:00.000-04:00The ad also bumfuzzles me by having homeless and g...The ad also bumfuzzles me by having homeless and gay equally rejected--as if it were indeed mere snobbery going on; senses and sensibilities offended, and not the implications of actual sin. <BR/>As if the 'guilty' churches only judge on desirability, and not on the basis of outward sinfulness.<BR/>And as if Jesus--the Jesus of the ad--accepts the poor and homeless, and the actively homosexual, in the exact same way, while the snobby church rejects them in exactly the same way.<BR/>And as if the church views sin from its own idea of what's contemptible, and not the Lord's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com